VLA Policies Do Not Know When Not to Act: Unintended Task Execution and Start Suppression
A new arXiv study examines whether vision-language-action policies refrain from acting when instructions are missing, meaningless, infeasible, or refer to the wrong task. Across six checkpoints in LIBERO-Goal simulation, an empty instruction still caused movement in every episode, and five checkpoints often completed a task the instruction had not specified. Three suppression approaches were tested: an instruction prefix failed across all six checkpoints, an action-chunk gate held the robot on non-task inputs in five of six, and fine-tuning prevented task completion on non-task inputs but did not reliably keep the robot still or handle infeasible instructions.
Why it matters: It provides concrete evidence that current VLA policies can start and execute tasks without valid instructions, an important safety issue for embodied AI deployment.