Back to AI News
arxiv

Latent-Lens: Enabling Visual Perception in Small Language Models via Latent Communication

Latent-Lens is a lightweight codec that lets a frozen vision-language model (VLM) pass visual information directly to a frozen small language model (SLM) through hidden states, bypassing the lossy text bottleneck. It trains only about 1.6 million parameters (0.2% of combined model size) and improves visual question answering and image captioning over text-based communication with the same LoRA budget. The method is validated across different model architectures and sizes.

AI Brief

This paper introduces a novel, parameter-efficient method for cross-modal latent communication that significantly boosts SLM performance on visual tasks, offering practical value for modular AI systems.

arXiv:2610.41751v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Bridging independent vision-language models (VLMs) and small language models (SLMs) in a modular multi-agent system typically forces them to exchange information as discrete text, which creates a lossy bottleneck for spatial and fine-grained details. This constraint is especially acute for SLMs, whose limited capacity makes them more reliant on the quality of the input signal. Recent latent-communication methods exchange states between language models. How a VLM can pass visual information to a separately pretrained text-only SLM though remains unexplored. We propose \textbf{Latent-Lens}, a lightweight codec that bridges the representation gap between a frozen VLM and a frozen SLM directly in latent space, enabling them to communicate purely through hidden states. The codec consists of a domain encoder that projects hidden states from the VLM into the SLM's embedding space, and an attention decoder formalised as a LoRA that teaches the SLM to attend to these visual prefixes, while training only ${\sim}1.6$M parameters (0.2\% of the combined model size). On visual question answering (CLEVR, GQA), Latent-Lens achieves $81.0\pm7.9$\% and $65.4\pm5.4$\%, compared with $58.3\pm5.7$\% and $61.8\pm1.0$\% for text communication with the same LoRA budget (+30.2--69.8pp relative to frozen text communication), while on image captioning (Flickr8k) it improves over the same baseline by +16.5 (+18.8 frozen). We also evaluate Latent-Lens with TinyLlama-1.1B and InternVL2-1B, which use different architectures, vocabularies, and hidden dimensions.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!