Back to AI News
arxiv

VeriCUA: Verification as Agentic Exploration for Computer-Using Agents

VeriCUA is a platform-agnostic framework that treats task-completion verification for computer-using agents as dynamic evidence gathering and assessment. It first inspects available context to build a task rubric, then selects GUI or code checks for unresolved requirements and combines their findings under explicit evidence rules. The authors report improved agreement with reference labels over compared baselines, with the largest offline gains on hard cases and stronger rejection of false completion claims online.

AI Brief

It offers a concrete verification method for improving CUA data curation, evaluation, and reinforcement learning across platforms.

arXiv:2610.40578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Building and scaling computer-using agents (CUAs) across desktop, mobile, and web environments requires reliable task-completion verification for data curation, evaluation, and reinforcement learning. Typical automated approaches prompt vision-language models (VLMs) to judge trajectories or generate programs to inspect application state. However, both rely on partial views of complex digital environments. VLM judges are restricted to supplied observations, while generated programs depend on accessible state. These views can omit decisive evidence or leave completion judgments unsupported. Tailoring separate verifiers to different platforms and access settings adds further engineering cost. We present VeriCUA, a platform-agnostic framework for verification through agentic exploration. It treats verification as dynamic evidence gathering and assessment within a shared procedure for online and offline settings across platforms and observation modalities. After inspecting the available context to construct a task rubric, the verifier selects GUI or code checks for unresolved requirements and combines their findings under explicit evidence rules. Experiments show improved agreement with reference labels over the compared baselines across these settings, with the largest offline gains on hard cases and stronger rejection of false completion claims online. Further analyses connect these gains to complementary evidence and test-time exploration.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!