Back to AI News
arxiv

Value-Conditioned Proposal Acquisition for Test-Time Reasoning

The paper introduces ValueFormation, a test-time policy that decides after each primary-model draw whether to stop, continue sampling, or acquire a proposal from a heterogeneous reasoning specialist. The policy uses a cost-regularized value scale learned from vote-state features, which is frozen across tasks and primary models. On MATH-500, a single Llama-fitted calibration improves accuracy by over 15 points for three 8B primaries and transfers to Qwen3-14B without retraining. Ablations show that removing acquisition drops accuracy by 20.43 points, confirming the benefit of state-conditioned acquisition over mere specialist access.

AI Brief

Provides a practical, transferable method for improving test-time reasoning with heterogeneous specialists, backed by strong empirical results on math and code benchmarks.

arXiv:2611.02852v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sampling and selection spend test-time compute inside a candidate pool, but they cannot recover a correct answer that never enters it. We introduce ValueFormation, a test-time policy that decides after each primary-model draw whether to stop, continue sampling, or acquire one proposal from a heterogeneous reasoning specialist. The three actions are compared on one cost-regularized value scale learned from vote-state features; the calibration is frozen across tasks and primary models, and acquired proposals are accepted only through a frozen posterior comparison. On held-out MATH-500, one Llama-fitted calibration improves over the strongest of eight identically evaluated baselines by more than fifteen points for each of three 8B primaries and transfers unchanged to Qwen3-14B. Removing acquisition lowers Llama MATH accuracy by 20.43 points, while same-trace and same-access replays attribute the gain to state-conditioned acquisition rather than specialist access alone. Where primary coverage is high, as on GSM8K, acquisition is rare and gains mainly come from cheaper allocation; on MBPP, a fixed code route attains the top accuracy at the lowest interaction cost. Varying the token price monotonically reduces calls without retraining.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!