arXiv:2611.06868v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In this work, we evaluate a simple inference-time scaling approach based on \textit{turn-level best-of-N sampling} (\method) for large language model (LLM) agents on complex, long-horizon tasks. We instantiate this using a \textit{generator-selector} framework with two LLMs; at each turn, a \emph{generator} model generates $N$ candidate actions and a \emph{selector} model selects one of them, which is then executed in the environment. This paper is closely related to the work of \cite{zainullina2025guided} who used critic models for guided search at inference time. Different from their work, we evaluate if off-the-shelf, open-weight LLMs can be effective at comparing different candidate actions directly. Experiments on long-horizon terminal tasks show that \method can lead to significant performance improvements, both in terms of accuracy (5--10\%) and consistency across repeated attempts. Analysis of agent trajectories reveal a shift in agent behaviour towards desirable patterns such as reduction in number of attempts to solve the task, improved task instruction following, debugging and testing.
arxiv
Turn-Level Best-of-N Sampling Boosts LLM Agent Performance
This paper introduces turn-level best-of-N sampling, a simple inference-time scaling method for LLM agents on long-horizon tasks. Using a generator-selector framework with two off-the-shelf open-weight LLMs, the approach improves accuracy by 5-10% and consistency across repeated attempts. Analysis shows agents adopt desirable behaviors like fewer attempts, better instruction following, and improved debugging.
Provides a practical, off-the-shelf method to improve LLM agent performance without fine-tuning, with measurable gains on complex tasks.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to comment!