arXiv:2611.02889v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in medical question answering (QA) systems. While recent works aim at incrementally improving the downstream task accuracy, an empirical estimation of the models' energy consumption and the associated carbon footprints is often overlooked. In this study, we demonstrate how practitioners can estimate energy consumption and arrive at reliable emission estimates for medical QA tasks available in the OpenMedical-LLM leaderboard by investigating 13 LLMs from 3 model families ranging from 270M to 14B parameters. We discuss how one can critically interpret energy versus accuracy trade-offs for a set of models for a given task. With this work, we underline that reporting disjoint energy and accuracy metrics alone does not suffice for careful trade-off assessments, but it also demands systematic construction and interpretation of joint trade-off metrics. We envisage such studies aiding practitioners in adopting better and more efficient models for their task and helping them become active participants in building sustainable LLM pipelines.
arxiv
Tug of Watts: A study on the Energy - Accuracy Trade-off of Large Language Models on Medical Question Answering Tasks
This study examines the energy consumption and carbon footprint of 13 LLMs (270M to 14B parameters) on medical QA tasks from the OpenMedical-LLM leaderboard. It demonstrates how to estimate energy and emissions, and argues that separate accuracy and energy metrics are insufficient, requiring joint trade-off metrics for informed model selection. The work aims to help practitioners adopt more efficient models for sustainable LLM pipelines.
Provides concrete, recent empirical data on energy-accuracy trade-offs for medical QA, addressing a critical gap in sustainable AI development.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to comment!