Back to AI News
arxiv

Temporal variability score shows high-variability knowledge improves faster late in pretraining

Researchers define a temporal variability score (TVS) as the coefficient of variation of an item’s negative log-likelihood across point-in-time language models trained on web snapshots from different years. Using six benchmarks and six models from multiple open-source families, they find that low- and high-TVS items are learned similarly early, while high-TVS items improve faster later in training. At the end of pretraining, high-TVS items outperform low-TVS items in 34 of 36 model-benchmark settings, with an average advantage of 7.3 chance-normalized accuracy points. The pattern is strongest on knowledge-intensive tasks, even for items of similar difficulty.

AI Brief

It offers a concrete diagnostic for how different kinds of knowledge are acquired during pretraining beyond aggregate benchmark scores.

arXiv:2610.37631v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models pretrained on web corpora collected over multiple years learn both general and domain-specific knowledge. How these different kinds of knowledge are learned as pretraining progresses remains unclear. Recent point-in-time models trained on web snapshots from different years provide a way to probe how knowledge prevalence varies over time. Using these models, we propose a temporal variability score (TVS), defined as the coefficient of variation of an item's negative log-likelihood across models. A higher score suggests that the knowledge may be less consistently represented across years of web text. We evaluate six benchmarks covering diverse topics using six models from multiple open-source model families. We find that low- and high-TVS items are learned similarly early in training, but high-TVS items improve faster later on. At the end of the pretraining run, high-TVS items outperform low-TVS items in 34 of 36 model-benchmark settings, with an average advantage of 7.3 points of chance-normalized accuracy. This pattern is most robust on knowledge-intensive tasks, even when comparing items of similar difficulty. Our findings reveal differences in how knowledge is learned over the course of pretraining, with temporal variability providing a diagnostic of these learning dynamics beyond aggregate benchmark scores.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!