Back to AI News
arxiv

TeamGym benchmarks LLM agents on team decisions with distributed information

Researchers introduced TeamGym, an environment for evaluating and training language-model agents on team decision-making tasks built from legal, finance, medical, and software engineering corpora. TeamGym uses a method to identify "pivotal information"—a minimal set of facts that is individually necessary and collectively sufficient for a correct decision—so it can control how information is distributed and measure whether agents integrate it. Across 8 language models and 12 source corpora, distributing pivotal information lowered success by 22.9 percentage points versus giving it to a single model, and requiring agents to extract that information themselves lowered success by a further 19.9 points. Reinforcement learning on final-decision loss improved decision quality and produced emergent coordination in participation, speaker selection, and communication.

AI Brief

It provides a concrete benchmark and training method for a key multi-agent weakness: sharing and integrating distributed information.

arXiv:2610.37571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many real-world decisions require teams to integrate information distributed across participants. Yet AI agents are still primarily trained and benchmarked in isolation. We introduce TeamGym, an environment for evaluating and training language model-based agents on team decision-making problems constructed from real-world legal, finance, medical, and software engineering corpora. TeamGym introduces a method to identify a minimal set of facts, each element of which is necessary and all of which are collectively sufficient for a correct final decision, which we call pivotal information. This enables TeamGym to both control the distribution of pivotal information and track how well agents identify and integrate pivotal information when making team decisions. Examining 8 language models on 12 source corpora, we find that current AI agents often fail to effectively share information: Distributing pivotal information across participants lowers success rate by 22.9 percentage points on average relative to giving the same information to a single model (a communication gap). We also document that participants do not effectively retrieve decision-relevant information on their own: A team's success rate is lowered by a further 19.9 points when participants must identify and extract pivotal information from source material rather than receiving it directly (a retrieval gap). To help remedy these deficits, we use TeamGym to train policies through reinforcement learning on team decision loss. Across two policy-training experiments, we find that training improves final-decision quality and induces emergent coordination in participation, speaker selection, and communication, even though the reward evaluates only the final decision.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!