arXiv:2611.03219v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Recently, harness self-evolution has emerged as an important paradigm for improving agent performance. Prior studies show that evolving the agent harness can effectively enhance agent capabilities without modifying the foundation model's parameters. We find that existing approaches largely study agent evolution on a single task. In practice, coding agents may need to handle multiple task types over time. Whether an agent harness can continuously evolve across multiple tasks without suffering from catastrophic forgetting remains an important open question.
In this paper, we investigate this open question through a comprehensive empirical study of continual harness self-evolution. We organize three software engineering task datasets into six different evolution directions and apply two representative harness evolution methods to perform continual evolution along these directions. Our experimental results show that evolution on a subsequent dataset can substantially undermine the performance on previously seen datasets. For example, with DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, Meta-Harness improves its performance on SWE-Bench to 94.0% after evolution. However, after further evolution on FeatureBench, its performance on SWE-Bench drops to 32.0% by the fifth round, corresponding to a 66% relative decrease. Finally, based on our experimental findings, we identify several insights, providing directions for the continual self-evolution of agent harnesses. Code is available at https://github.com/THU-Agent/continual-harness-evolution.
arxiv
Study Finds Coding Agents Forget Previous Tasks During Continual Harness Evolution
A new empirical study investigates whether coding agent harnesses can evolve continuously across multiple tasks without catastrophic forgetting. Using six evolution directions across three software engineering datasetshare, the authors show that evolving on a new dataset can severely degrade performance on previously learned tasks—e.g., Meta-Harness drops from 94.0% to 32.0% on SWE-Bench after five rounds of further evolution. The paper provides insights for designing continual self-evolution methods for agent harnesses.
This is a concrete, recent research finding that highlights a critical limitation in agent self-evolution, offering actionable insights for the AI community.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to comment!