Back to AI News
arxiv

Risk-Sensitive On-Orbit Inspection Planning with Distributional RL

The paper presents an adaptive planning approach for multi-target on-orbit inspection missions in low Earth orbit using distributional reinforcement learning. A Quantile-Regression Deep Q-Network agent selects the next target by jointly considering expected return and return variance through a mean-variance criterion, while modeling stochastic target risk states and a limited mission-time budget. Experiments with five target satellites show that a risk-aversion weight trades mean return for lower return variance and a reduced probability of mission loss, and that learned policies approach an exactly computed efficient frontier.

AI Brief

It offers a concrete example of risk-sensitive distributional RL applied to autonomous space mission planning, useful for readers tracking RL in safety-critical decision-making.

arXiv:2610.41647v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-target on-orbit servicing missions require planning tools that can adapt to evolving operational conditions while accounting for the outcome variability inherent to safety-critical spaceflight. This paper presents an adaptive planning approach for multi-target servicing campaigns in low Earth orbit and applies it to inspection missions flown by a low-thrust servicer. The approach is based on Distributional Reinforcement Learning, which learns the full distribution of mission returns and thereby supports explicit risk-sensitive decision-making at each planning step. Specifically, a Quantile-Regression Deep Q-Network (QR-DQN) agent selects which target to inspect next by jointly considering the expectation and the variance of the predicted return through a mean-variance criterion. The mission environment models circular orbits with a spread in inclination and uses Edelbaum's combined-manoeuvre low-thrust transfer estimates. The observation comprises the orbital elements, the visit history, the observed risk state of each target and the remaining mission-time budget. The risk state of each target changes stochastically during the campaign, making the outcome of an inspection uncertain and creating operationally meaningful distinctions between risk-neutral and risk-averse planning strategies. Because the mission-time budget generally admits only a subset of the candidate targets, the planner must also select which targets to inspect. Numerical experiments on scenarios with five target satellites show that one risk-aversion weight moves the policy across a range of mean return and return variance, over an unchanged environment and reward. Risk-averse agents reduce the variance of the episodic return by approximately one half relative to risk-neutral agents and lower the probability of a mission loss, at a cost in mean return. To validate the learned policies, the efficient frontier, which gives the highest mean return attainable at each level of return variance, is computed exactly by enumerating the admissible visit orders. At equal variance, the learned policies lie close to this frontier in mean return, and the risk-averse policies have a lower probability of a mission loss than the frontier policies.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!