Back to AI News
arxiv

PB-AMD optimizes privacy-budget allocation across private training steps

A new paper introduces Privacy-Budget Adjoint Mirror Descent (PB-AMD) to optimize Gaussian noise schedules across differentially private training iterations under a fixed, certified privacy budget. The authors establish theoretical guarantees under stated assumptions and derive an explicit allocation rule for a linear-quadratic setting. Experiments show improvements over uniform allocation in a learning-rate restart setting, although learning-rate-based allocation performs similarly; schedule optimization is also faster than projected gradient descent at a common stationarity tolerance on the tested problems.

AI Brief

The work offers a theoretically grounded method for improving private-learning utility through privacy-budget scheduling, with experimental benefits that remain setting-dependent.

arXiv:2610.39954v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Privacy accounting bounds the cumulative privacy cost of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent but does not determine how to allocate a fixed budget across iterations. We formulate the complete Gaussian noise-variance schedule as an open-loop control under a composed zero-Concentrated Differential Privacy constraint, explicitly accounting for schedule selection. For expected quadratic terminal tracking, we prove that every local minimizer exhausts the certified budget, yielding an exact-budget simplex formulation. We introduce Privacy-Budget Adjoint Mirror Descent (PB-AMD), combining pathwise adjoint gradients with entropic updates that preserve positivity, charge floors, and the prescribed budget. Under regularity and coercivity assumptions, we establish existence and budget stability of optimal schedules, design-to-training utility stability, and deterministic, stochastic, and sample-average stationarity guarantees. A linear-quadratic reduction yields an explicit square-root allocation law. Experiments demonstrate tracking improvements over several allocation rules and predictive improvements over uniform allocation in a learning-rate restart setting, where learning-rate allocation performs similarly. Comparisons at a common stationarity tolerance show lower schedule-optimization times than projected gradient descent on the tested problems. The framework connects certified privacy accounting with optimization through nonlinear training dynamics.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!