Back to AI News
arxiv

Online Evidence-Containment Prediction over Text Spans under Distinct Queries

The paper formalizes Online Evidence-Containment Prediction (OECP) for nested text spans in evidence-grounded NLP systems. It shows that span containment corresponds to a triangular 2D product order, enabling distinct-query online isotonic regression with near-linear regret for multiple targets and optimal logarithmic regret for a single fixed target. Experiments on Natural Questions demonstrate deductive and learned gains, while the Expected Search-space Reduction (ESR) method localizes evidence with fewer verifier calls, outperforming selectors on SciFact, ERASER, and DPR hierarchies.

AI Brief

Provides a principled theoretical framework and practical method for efficient evidence verification in NLP, with strong empirical results and regret guarantees.

arXiv:2610.41384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evidence-grounded NLP systems often verify nested text regions sequentially, so verifying one region constrains others. We formalize this as Online Evidence-Containment Prediction (OECP): each candidate is predicted before exact verification and queried at most once. Span containment is exactly a triangular 2D product order, making OECP distinct-query online isotonic regression. With multiple admissible targets, worst-case regret is near-linear, $\widetilde{\Theta}(m_{\mathrm{eff}})$, in the effective scale given by endpoint-rank compression; a single fixed target, as in standard QA, admits an explicit polynomial-time learner with optimal $\Theta(\log m_{\mathrm{eff}})$ regret, run on real NQ episodes. On Natural Questions, containment yields a large deductive gain plus a smaller learned gain on unresolved candidates, reproduced across two backbones and DPR hierarchies. Expected Search-space Reduction (ESR) turns these probabilities into decisions, localizing evidence in fewer verifier calls on SciFact, ERASER, and DPR hierarchies; on DPR hierarchies under call budgets it outperforms four recent external selectors and raises fixed-reader F1 over learned and generator-greedy scheduling.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!