Back to AI News
arxiv

LaBraM at Scale: Scaling Data and Models for EEG Pretraining

This paper scales the LaBraM EEG foundation model to up to 1.97 billion parameters and 79,910 hours of pretraining data, evaluating across 23 tasks. The largest models achieve 59.05% mean balanced accuracy in full fine-tuning and 54.33% in linear probing, outperforming prior baselines. Results show that larger encoders benefit full fine-tuning more than linear probing, and that downstream performance can decline as pretraining loss decreases.

AI Brief

Provides concrete scaling results for EEG foundation models, offering practical insights for model and data scaling in a specialized domain.

arXiv:2611.03165v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LaBraM, an early EEG foundation model, demonstrated that large-scale EEG pretraining can yield strong representations for diverse downstream tasks. Building on this foundation, we expand pretraining data and model capacity while retaining its core encoder and objective. We train ten encoders with 5.8 million to 1.97 billion parameters on three EEG collections spanning 25,067 to 79,910 hours, adapting signal preparation and training to heterogeneous recordings. Across 23 tasks, Atom-L* reaches 59.05% mean balanced accuracy at its best evaluated full fine-tuning (Full-FT) checkpoint, 3.61 percentage points above the strongest baseline EEG foundation model. Quark-G leads linear probing (LP) at 54.33%, a 1.24-point margin. Both also lead average task rank. At the last evaluated checkpoints, larger encoders improve Full-FT more consistently than LP, and stronger LP does not guarantee stronger Full-FT. Preserving patch structure improves LP over average pooling. Data-fraction experiments suggest capacity-dependent saturation, while checkpoint trajectories show that downstream performance can decline as pretraining loss falls. Joint classification with a shared Qwen3 readout reaches 50.50% with Molecule-H and Qwen3-8B; increasing language-model size provides no consistent gain. These results demonstrate the value of scaling LaBraM and the importance of matching pretraining scale to downstream adaptation.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!