Back to AI News
arxiv

Kierston & KierstonBench: Simulated City Benchmark for AI in Crime Investigation

The paper introduces Kierston, a city-scale simulation of Allentown, PA, and KierstonBench, a benchmark for evaluating language models in crime investigation and surveillance tasks. It generates realistic records from a common behavioral timeline and tests models on 32 task families. Evaluation of 16 models shows most fail, while a few frontier models solve most tasks but still fall for deceptions.

AI Brief

Provides a novel, concrete benchmark for a critical AI application area, with clear evaluation results and practical implications.

arXiv:2611.04785v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models are candidates for collecting and analyzing records in criminal investigations and mass surveillance. Their capability and accuracy in this work cannot currently be measured. Real deployments lack the ground truth needed to score a model's conclusions, and no benchmark evaluates these capabilities in a simulated environment. We present Kierston, a city-scale simulation engine, and KierstonBench, a benchmark that tests these capabilities against known simulated events. Kierston models approximately 125,000 residents of Allentown, Pennsylvania, generating their daily activities and the telecommunications, financial, administrative and license-plate records that surveillance and investigative systems collect about them. These records derive from a common behavioral timeline and are distributed across sources representing separate providers. Models investigate through a restricted records interface, linking observations across sources without access to the underlying simulation. The benchmark comprises 32 task families covering record linkage, routine reconstruction, incident investigation and assessment of deceptive accounts. In an evaluation of sixteen language models, most could not perform records investigation and submitted identifications the records did not support. A small number of frontier models solved most of the tasks and abstained when evidence was insufficient. In some cases these models still fell for common deceptions and assumptions, and none replaced an investigator.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!