Implicit Assumptions About Tasks in Continual Learning
This paper clarifies that continual learning measurements depend on factors like data similarity, change rate, and order, which can be defined at different levels: underlying data, partition, or learner. The authors show these levels often don't coincide and are usually left implicit, leading to ambiguous results. Through teacher-student experiments, they demonstrate that changing granularity, order, or similarity structure alters measured outcomes. They also review benchmarks to see which properties are stated, noting that for foundation models with undisclosed data, properties are inherited by the model's initial state.
Provides a framework to disambiguate continual learning evaluations, helping researchers interpret benchmark results more accurately.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to comment!