Back to AI News
arxiv

Hybrid LSTM-XGBoost Framework Predicts Landing-Phase Safety Events from Imbalanced Flight Data

This paper introduces an interpretable hybrid framework for predicting rare landing-phase safety events from imbalanced flight data. It fuses LSTM autoencoder reconstruction errors with statistical flight features and feeds them into a class-weighted XGBoost classifier. Evaluated on 53,750 NASA DASHlink approach windows, the method achieves mean macro recall above 0.90 across airports, with component comparisons and feature attribution analysis. The study offers practical guidance for adapting flight-data monitoring models to airport-level data availability.

AI Brief

Provides a concrete, reproducible method for rare-event prediction in aviation with strong results and interpretability, useful for safety monitoring and data-driven decision-making.

arXiv:2611.08386v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Landing-phase safety-event prediction requires the detection of rare abnormal approaches within strongly imbalanced multivariate flight data. Capturing coupled temporal behavior while distinguishing event-specific signatures across airport operating contexts remains a central modeling challenge. This study proposes an interpretable hybrid feature-fusion framework for multiclass landing-phase safety-event prediction. A long short-term memory (LSTM) autoencoder trained on nominal flight windows characterizes deviations from routine approach behavior. Its continuous reconstruction-error descriptor is fused with parameter-specific statistical flight-history features and supplied to a class-weighted XGBoost classifier to distinguish Normal, Speed High, Path High, and Flaps Late windows. The framework is evaluated using 53,750 NASA DASHlink approach windows from three arrival airports. Pooled and airport-specific learning strategies are compared alongside component-level benchmarks, repeated pipeline retraining, and feature-attribution analysis. The results demonstrate strong class-balanced detection, with mean macro recall above 0.90 across all airports under repeated partitioning and retraining. Component comparisons establish the importance of class weighting and show that continuous feature fusion outperforms reconstruction-error-only and hard-gate alternatives. Airport-level comparisons reveal benefits from local specialization at the two airports with larger datasets and from pooled training at the airport with the smallest dataset. Feature attributions associate predictions with operationally relevant vertical-path, configuration, speed, and approach-context variables. The framework provides an interpretable approach to rare-event detection and practical guidance for adapting flight-data monitoring models to airport-level data availability.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!