Back to AI News
arxiv

From Representation to Readout: Mechanistic Analysis of Membership Signals in Language Models

This arXiv paper presents a mechanistic study of membership inference signals in large language models, introducing Decodable Information Score, Used Information Score, and Readout Accessibility Gap (DUG) to separate membership information in internal representations from information exposed through readout. Across supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement-learning-based membership inference methods, it reports membership-specific effects in both decodable information and readout under SFT, but primarily in readout under RL methods, with activation patching localizing effects to intermediate layers. The paper also examines reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards contamination and finds behavioral changes can emerge without a corresponding increase in likelihood-based membership inference signals.

AI Brief

It offers a structured mechanistic framework for understanding why membership inference signals appear in LLMs, which is useful for privacy and interpretability research.

arXiv:2610.41445v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Membership inference aims to determine whether a particular example was included in a model's training data. Such membership signals are often broadly described as memorization, while the underlying mechanisms can involve both how information is represented internally and how it is accessed by the model to produce behaviors. We therefore present a mechanistic study of membership signals in large language models (LLMs). We introduce Decodable Information Score, Used Information Score, and Readout Accessibility Gap (DUG), a set of complementary measures that separately quantify membership information decodable from internal representations and the extent to which it is exposed through the model's readout. Across supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL)-based membership inference methods, membership-specific effects appear in both the amount of decodable information and readout under SFT, while under RL-based membership inference methods they appear primarily in readout. Activation patching further localizes this membership-specific effect to intermediate layers. To examine whether these findings extend to a more general RL setting, we further study reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) contamination, where the training reward is independent of the reference solution. In this setting, we find that behavioral changes can emerge without a corresponding increase in likelihood-based membership inference signals.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!