arXiv:2610.37405v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can answer many factual questions correctly, but a correct answer is not necessarily a supported one. For an LLM agent, a knowledge graph (KG) plays two roles: as a source of answers, it supplies facts that the model lacks; as a source of evidence, it supplies the supporting triples that make an answer traceable and auditable. However, existing KG agents treat the KG only as a source of answers: their training data carries answers but not evidence, and their training rewards check the answer but not the retrieved evidence, so agents often answer correctly without retrieving the supporting triples. We propose FoG, a framework that trains KG agents to retrieve the evidence behind their answers. FoG consists of evidence-grounded synthesis, a KG interaction agent, and an evidence-coverage process reward (ECPR): the synthesis recursively hides explicit entities behind verifiable sub-questions, so that every question carries its supporting triples by construction; the agent records the triples returned by the KG; and ECPR credits each supporting triple to the turn that first retrieves it. Experiments on three KGQA benchmarks demonstrate that FoG enables 3B--4B open-source agents to outperform substantially larger baselines in answer accuracy and evidence coverage, with zero-shot cross-KG transfer.
arxiv
FoG: Training KG Agents to Retrieve the Evidence Behind Their Answers
FoG is a framework for training knowledge-graph agents to retrieve the supporting triples behind factual answers, not merely produce correct answers. It combines evidence-grounded synthesis that hides explicit entities behind verifiable sub-questions, a KG interaction agent that records returned triples, and an evidence-coverage process reward that credits each supporting triple to the turn that first retrieves it. Experiments on three KGQA benchmarks show 3B–4B open-source agents outperforming substantially larger baselines in answer accuracy and evidence coverage, with zero-shot cross-KG transfer.
It addresses a concrete gap in KG agent training—answer correctness without auditable evidence—and offers a method for improving traceability.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to comment!