Back to AI News
arxiv

FedReady: Bounded LLM Agents Automate Federation Formation in Federated Learning

FedReady is a system that uses bounded LLM agents to automate federation formation in federated learning, including site discovery, eligibility verification, and preparation of shared contracts, local adapters, and task code. In simulations with 39 retinal sites and four tasks, it achieved perfect recall with 0.65 precision, removed all false positives, and supported 45,575 task-record instances across 100-round jobs. The system also demonstrated high fidelity to manual reference analysis with a maximum survival-curve difference of 0.001133.

AI Brief

This paper presents a concrete system that addresses a practical bottleneck in federated learning, with quantitative results showing feasibility and reliability, making it valuable for researchers and practitioners.

arXiv:2611.03586v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) runtimes standardize aggregation and deployment, but each new study still requires federation formation: selecting task-eligible sites and preparing their local data and task code for federated training or analysis. This preparation recurs when the target changes, while raw records and site-private mappings are excluded from cross-site FL messages. We present FedReady, a system that performs federation formation with bounded LLM agents. Agents propose shared contracts, local adapters, and task code; the runtime owns workflow state and accepts artifacts only after checks tied to their digests. Candidate site discovery prioritizes recall; local eligibility verification checks task support before site admission. Once participating sites and artifacts are fixed, conventional federated training or analysis proceeds without readiness agents. Across 39 simulated retinal sites and four tasks, discovery reaches recall 1.00 at precision 0.65; local eligibility verification removes all 17 false positives without losing an eligible site-task pair. The participating sites supply 45,575 task-record instances and complete four 100-round jobs, including one with a runtime-generated contract. Across ten patient cohorts, preparation supports seven patient populations and holds endpoints at three sources as unsupported. Comparison with manually prepared reference populations and analysis (the manual reference) gives a maximum survival-curve difference of 0.001133. We also analyze 19 development failures, targeted classification ablations, and standalone and heterogeneous agent configurations. These results establish the feasibility of task-specific data preparation before ordinary FL training or analysis.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!