arXiv:2611.04546v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) assistants are increasingly proposed for regulatory affairs, yet their reliability in regulatory tasks remains unclear. We introduce the EU AI Act Q&A Benchmark, an expert-curated benchmark of 110 open-ended questions about the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Each question comes with an exemplary answer, question-specific correctness criteria, and expected references. Evaluation measures answer correctness, reference quality, conciseness, tone, and latency, with a multi-turn ``hard mode'' testing responses to simulated user pushback. We also present the results of the 2026 EU AI Act Q&A Challenge, based on the benchmark, where three off-the-shelf baselines and five purpose-built assistants (from four commercial developers and one academic entrant) were tested. Only two of the five submitted assistants consistently outperformed the baselines; one achieved high scores across all evaluated metrics. These results show that specialist development alone does not guarantee better performance and highlight the critical importance of LLM assistant evaluation in regulatory affairs. The benchmark code is openly available at https://github.com/regenold-GmbH/eu-ai-act-benchmark-2026/.
arxiv
EU AI Act Q&A Benchmark Reveals Mixed Readiness of LLM Assistants for Regulatory Tasks
Researchers introduce an expert-curated benchmark of 110 open-ended questions about the EU AI Act to evaluate LLM assistants in regulatory affairs. In the 2026 challenge, only two of five purpose-built assistants outperformed baselines, with one achieving high scores across all metrics. The results indicate that specialist development alone does not guarantee better performance, underscoring the need for rigorous evaluation in regulatory contexts.
Provides concrete benchmark results and insights into LLM reliability for regulatory tasks, valuable for developers and compliance professionals.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to comment!