Back to AI News
arxiv

Clinical-Protocol-Aware Cyber Resilience Framework for Connected Medical Devices

This paper introduces a cyber-resilience framework for connected clinical technologies that integrates clinical protocols into security design and evaluation. Using Monte Carlo simulations, it shows that segmented architectures reduce cyber exposure by 56.3% compared to connected ones, and combined prevention and containment cut exposure by 60.1%. The study also reveals that technical cyber exposure and clinical impact can diverge, highlighting the need for clinical-context-aware security controls.

AI Brief

Provides a novel framework and simulation insights for securing healthcare IoT, addressing a critical intersection of AI-enabled threats and clinical safety.

arXiv:2610.41784v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Healthcare increasingly relies on connected medical devices, clinical information systems, cloud services, and distributed-care technologies, creating cybersecurity risks across clinical workflows. AI-enabled capabilities can accelerate vulnerability discovery and attack-path analysis, increasing the need to limit compromise propagation. This paper proposes a clinical-protocol-aware cyber-resilience framework based on bounded clinical micro-networks and controlled interconnections. The framework integrates clinical factors into cybersecurity design, management, and evaluation, covering prevention, containment, and incident response. A parameterized Monte Carlo simulation distinguishes technical cyber exposure from modeled clinical consequence. Experiments investigate architectural connectivity, adversarial capability, security controls, protocol dependency, risk alignment, communication directionality, lifecycle integration, and response timing. Under the simulation assumptions, connected architecture increases mean cyber exposure by 56.3% relative to segmented architecture, while combined prevention and containment reduce exposure by 60.1% relative to no controls. Increasing protocol dependency raises the modeled clinical-impact index from 1.021 to 7.567 without changing mean cyber exposure, demonstrating that technical exposure and clinical consequence can diverge. Risk-alignment experiments further indicate higher modeled clinical impact when greater technical risk corresponds to greater clinical significance. The findings support comparative architectural analysis, not calibrated estimates of real-world cyber risk, control effectiveness, or patient harm. The framework provides a clinical-context-aware approach to security-boundary design, control prioritization, and coordinated containment in connected healthcare environments.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!