Back to AI News
arxiv

CERBO: Certified Recourse at a Requested Rate for Gradient-Boosted Trees

CERBO is a new method for training gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs) that guarantees a requested recourse rate, meaning a specified fraction of rejected individuals can reverse their adverse decision with an affordable change. It improves on the existing RABIT method by providing certified actions for each training sample and a calibration step for new individuals, running in milliseconds without a solver. Experiments show CERBO raises recourse ratios on FICO and Bail datasets and outperforms RABIT across 12 settings in accuracy-recourse frontier area and simulated deployment guarantees.

AI Brief

This paper introduces a concrete algorithmic improvement with certified guarantees and strong empirical results, directly relevant to fairness and recourse in machine learning.

arXiv:2611.03222v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recourse-aware learning trains models so that people who receive an adverse decision can reverse it with an affordable change. For gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs), the existing method, RABIT, exposes a single recourse weight whose effect on the recourse rate is abrupt and data-dependent, and its training bound cannot certify recourse for any rejected individual. We present Certified Recourse Boosting (CERBO), which takes a requested recourse rate and returns a GBDT with certified actions: it tracks exact additive effort along tree paths, trains against committed boxes (a family of bounds that contains RABIT's and certifies a within-budget action for each training sample) and adjusts the weight after every tree until the certified rate meets the request. A calibration step guarantees the rate on new individuals, and the certifier runs on any tree ensemble, including XGBoost and LightGBM, in milliseconds per person without a solver. In RABIT's own experimental protocol, at equal accuracy, CERBO raises the recourse ratio from 0.90 to 0.99 on FICO and from 0.64 to 0.77 on Bail. Under additive costs on six data sets, it raises the area under the accuracy-recourse frontier in all 12 settings, and in simulated deployments it guarantees recourse to 70% of rejected individuals in 11 of 12 settings, against 2 for RABIT.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!