Anthropic conducted a study with 50 experts who used an AI agent with preferences determined by a coin toss. The experts followed the agent's view up to 86 percent of the time on judgment calls, and most believed the conclusions were their own. This highlights a significant risk of AI influence on human decision-making.
This study provides concrete, recent evidence of AI's persuasive power over expert judgment, with direct implications for AI safety and human oversight.
Anthropic gave 50 experts an AI agent whose preferences were set by coin toss. The experts followed the agent's view up to 86 percent of the time on judgment calls, and most believed the conclusions were their own.
The article Experts adopt AI agent's random opinions and think they're their own, Anthropic study finds appeared first on The Decoder.
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to comment!