Back to AI News
arxiv

A Definition of Catastrophic Performance

This paper introduces a formal definition of catastrophic performance to distinguish suboptimal AI outcomes from truly catastrophic ones. The definition relies on two reference values: baseline value (no agent deployed) and orthogonal value (a trajectory unrelated to human preferences). Catastrophic performance is characterized as an agent undoing benefits from past human activity, enabling rigorous analysis of AI misalignment risk.

AI Brief

Provides a novel formal framework for a critical AI safety concept, useful for researchers and policymakers addressing alignment risks.

arXiv:2611.06219v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A central challenge in AI is specifying objectives that align with human preferences. While existing theoretical results elucidate how misspecification impacts performance, they typically do not distinguish between merely suboptimal and catastrophic outcomes. To enable rigorous analysis of catastrophic risk from AI misalignment, we introduce a formal definition of catastrophic performance. Our definition is based on two reference values. The first, baseline value, captures the value attained if no agent is deployed. The second, orthogonal value, captures the value of a trajectory that is unrelated to human preferences, in a sense we describe. Orthogonal value is typically far worse than baseline value. We interpret these reference values through examples in which past human activity has altered the state of the environment to human benefit. Starting at the resulting state, an AI agent is deployed with the goal of accelerating further progress. Catastrophic performance represents this agent's undoing of benefits afforded by human activity.
Be the first to rate this article.

Comments & Questions (0)

Captcha
Please be respectful — let's keep the conversation friendly.

No comments yet

Be the first to comment!