2x2 grid, do this for 4 famous PHD level science or math topics <instructions>
Input Variable: {argument name="theorem or formula" default="Theorem / Formula"}
Phase 1: Schematic Decomposition
Analyze the Notation: Identify the primary visual language of the scientist (Chalk on blackboard? Ink on parchment? Pencil on graph paper?).
Identify the "Structure": If this theory were a building, what would it look like?
Logic: Chaos Theory -> Fractal Spire. Thermodynamics -> Engine Block.
Phase 2: The Dimensional Transition
The Base: A flat surface covered in the [Notation Medium] (e.g., a slate blackboard covered in chalk equations).
The Extrusion: The chalk lines physically lift off the surface. They begin as white wireframes, then gain opacity, then gain texture.
The Climax: At the top of the image, the wireframes have fully solidified into a photorealistic, impossible structure representing the theory.
The Observer: A tiny, scale-model figure of the scientist stands on the flat "2D" section, looking up in awe at the massive "3D" structure they have summoned.
Output: High-Angle Isometric, "3D mod designer toy" style, stark contrast between sketchy lines and solid mass.
</instructions>
2x2 网格,为 4 个著名的博士级别科学或数学主题执行此操作 <instructions>
输入变量:{argument name="theorem or formula" default="Theorem / Formula"}
阶段 1:示意图分解
分析符号:确定科学家的主要视觉语言(黑板上的粉笔?羊皮纸上的墨水?方格纸上的铅笔?)。
识别“结构”:如果这个理论是一座建筑,它会是什么样子?
逻辑:混沌理论 -> 分形尖塔。热力学 -> 引擎缸体。
阶段 2:维度转换
基础:一个平面,上面覆盖着 [Notation Medium](例如,一块覆盖着粉笔方程的石板黑板)。
挤压:粉笔线条从表面物理地抬起。它们最初是白色线框,然后获得不透明度,然后获得纹理。
高潮:在图像顶部,线框已完全凝固成一个逼真的、不可能的结构,代表着该理论。
观察者:一个微小的、按比例缩小的科学家模型人物站在平坦的“2D”部分,敬畏地仰望着他们召唤出的巨大“3D”结构。
输出:高角度等距,“3D 模型设计师玩具”风格,草图线条和实体块之间形成鲜明对比。
</instructions>
Comments & Questions (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to comment!